Section 4 of 4 · Line 4
Informed Hope & Action
About 12 minutes
Step 1 · The line
The line we're fixing
This line wants students to feel hopeful, and that matters. But “everyone does their part” makes every part sound the same. Section 2 showed that the power to make decisions is part of adaptive capacity, and Section 3 showed that climate risk isn't shared equally. “Save the planet” also makes climate change sound like a test we either pass or fail.
Nothing you choose here is saved or sent.
Step 1 · Quick prediction
“Are we doomed?”
A student in your class asks this. Three teachers answer.
Text version of the scene
- Student: “Are we doomed?”
- Teacher A: “Don't worry. If we all recycle, it will be fine.”
- Teacher B: “Honestly, it might be too late.”
- Teacher C: “It's serious, and what we do still matters. Let me show you what people are already doing.”
Step 2 · Learn
Three ways to respond
-
Despair
“Nothing we do will make a difference.” It takes the problem seriously but sees no way forward, so people give up.
Teacher B was answering with despair.
-
Uncritical optimism
“It will all work out.” It feels good, but it hides how serious the problem is, so there's no reason to act.
Teacher A was answering with uncritical optimism.
-
Informed hope
It looks at the problem honestly and still sees real ways to act, especially together.
Teacher C was answering with informed hope.
Go deeper: what research says about hope
A study of young people in Sweden (Ojala, 2012) found two kinds of hope. Hope that came from taking the problem seriously, and from trusting that people can act together, was linked to more climate action. Hope that came from denying the problem was not.
Go deeper: an analogy for your classroom
A doctor finds a serious illness. One doctor says, “There's nothing we can do.” Another says, “You'll be fine, don't worry about it.” A good doctor says, “This is serious. Here is what we know, here are the treatments, and here is what you can do.” The third doctor is giving informed hope.
Every bit counts
“Save the planet” sounds like all or nothing. But the IPCC reports that every increase in warming makes climate hazards worse. Switch between two levels of global warming and compare.
Showing 1.5°C.
- Coral reefsDecline by 70 to 90%
- Arctic sea iceAn ice-free summer about once a century
- Sea level rise by 2100Up to about 10 million fewer people exposed than at 2°C
See both levels side by side
| Impact | At 1.5°C | At 2°C |
|---|---|---|
| Coral reefs | Decline by 70 to 90% | Decline by more than 99% |
| Arctic sea ice | An ice-free summer about once a century | An ice-free summer at least once a decade |
| Sea level rise by 2100 | Up to about 10 million fewer people exposed | Up to about 10 million more people exposed |
Half a degree changes a lot. That is why “every bit of warming we prevent matters” is a more accurate message than “save the planet,” and it gives students a reason to keep going.
Source: IPCC (2018), Global Warming of 1.5°C, Summary for Policymakers (paraphrased).
Not everyone, not equally
“Everyone does their part” sounds fair. But many of the actions in Section 2, like a town switching to wind power or a community rewetting a peatland, are things people do together, not one household at a time. Section 3 showed that the people facing the most risk are often already leading. A better message asks who has the power to make big changes, and who is already making them.
- A slogan asks“Can we save the planet?”
- A better message asks“How much harm can we prevent, and for whom?”
Try the three questions
Before you teach any climate action, ask three questions.
- Who benefits? Does it help the people facing the most harm, or mostly people who already have the most?
- Who decides? Are the people affected part of the decision?
- Does it break a loop? Does it deal with a cause, or only a symptom?
Try them on three actions from this module. Make your own guess first, then open each card to compare.
-
Rewetting Burns Bog
Compare your answers
- Who benefits?
- People nearby, from cleaner water and slower flooding; wildlife; and everyone, because the carbon stays in the ground.
- Who decides?
- The governments that bought and manage the bog. A good follow-up question: whose traditional territory is it, and are those Nations part of the decisions?
- Does it break a loop?
- Yes. Wet peat keeps its carbon, which interrupts the drying loop from Section 1.
-
Fossil-powered air conditioning in every home
Compare your answers
- Who benefits?
- Households that can afford it, during heat waves.
- Who decides?
- Each household, one at a time.
- Does it break a loop?
- No. The extra emissions add to warming, which feeds the loop instead of breaking it.
-
A city's cooling centres
Compare your answers
- Who benefits?
- People who can't keep cool at home, often older adults, low-income households, and people without housing.
- Who decides?
- City governments. They work best when the people who use them help plan them.
- Does it break a loop?
- No. It protects people from a symptom, not the cause. That doesn't make it a bad action; people need protection now. It just can't be the whole answer.
Step 3 · Check
Fix the message
A teacher's slide ends with: “Don't worry, kids! If we all turn off the lights, we'll save the planet.”
Step 4 · Fix it
Rewrite Line 4, then build your slide
Be honest about the problem, give a reason to act, and show that people act together. One or two sentences. Your text saves on this device only.
Compare with one possible version
“Climate change is serious, but what we do still matters, and every bit of warming we prevent helps. People around the world are already acting together, and we can join them.”
This version is honest about the problem, gives a reason to act, and talks about people acting together.
Part B: Build your slide
Your lines from Sections 1 to 3 appear below from what you saved on this device. Edit any of them so the four read well together as one slide for Grade 6 students. Prefer to sketch it, make a poster, or record it? Do that instead.
You haven't written Line 1 yet. Write it here, or go back to Section 1.
You haven't written Line 2 yet. Write it here, or go back to Section 2.
You haven't written Line 3 yet. Write it here, or go back to Section 3.
Line 4 comes from Part A above.
Compare with one possible slide
Look back
Optional reading
Indigenous adaptation: Not passive victims
Nursey-Bray, M., Palmer, R., Chischilly, A. M., Rist, P., & Yin, L. (2022). In Old ways for new days: Indigenous survival and agency in climate-changed times (pp. 25–56). Springer.
Open the chapter by Nursey-Bray et al. (2022) (opens in a new tab)You rewrote the whole slide
| Line | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | One cause, one effect | A loop, with places to break it |
| 2 | Actions one person does | Mitigation and adaptation, done together |
| 3 | “The most vulnerable” | People at risk who are also leading |
| 4 | “Save the planet!” | Informed hope: honest, and still worth acting on |
Your students will see a slide like the first one someday. What will your version say?
Back to the overview